Source, negotiate and recover
RFQs, supplier selection, commercial terms, alternatives, capacity constraints and supplier-quality recovery.
A practical idea after our conversations
If there is useful work, I would rather contribute than wait.
My background sits across technical procurement, suppliers, NPI/change and supply-chain operations. If Veo has a real need that fits, I can help.
If there is a role, ordinary paid employment is the obvious route. If not, a supported paid start or a short virksomhedspraktik can also make sense.
What this page is for: show what I can already contribute, one example of the kind of work I could take on, and simple ways to start.
Veo-specific work proposal · noindex
Why now
The Senior Buyer process made the fit clearer to me. Veo already knows my background, and I already know more about the way the team works.
If there is a real need, I can contribute with what I already know while learning Veo's products, suppliers, systems and way of working. If something relevant comes up later, neither side is starting from zero.
01 / What I bring
I work best where purchasing decisions affect suppliers, materials and production.
Technical sourcing, change, material visibility and recovery are strongest when they are treated as one operating problem.
30+EU / US suppliers in recent technical sourcing scope
200+complex multi-level product structures created / validated
2,000+AX/D365 purchasing, product and planning records
100+cost / sales-price data discrepancies identified during commercial checks
Carry change into execution
Drawings, BOMs, revisions, prototypes and FAI translated into supplier timing, material exposure, documentation and production readiness.
Make the constraint visible
Demand, stock, incoming supply, lead time and ERP/WMS accuracy used to decide what to buy, expedite, reallocate or escalate.
Two real examples: I stabilised a smaller supplier when growth exposed a capacity limit, and during roughly three weeks of reduced coverage I kept critical supplier, material, ERP and production-readiness work moving across work normally shared among three people.
02 / Why Veo still makes sense
The work sits at an interface I already know.
I am not tied to one job title. If there is useful work where suppliers, technical change, materials and Production meet, that is where I am strongest.
What would be new is the Veo-specific layer: the products, supplier base, category details, systems and internal ways of working. That is exactly the part I want to learn through real work while contributing with the procurement and operations experience I already have.
03 / Example work
One real problem is enough.
Veo chooses the problem. This only shows the kind of useful output I would aim to leave.
UnderstandNeed, timing, stock/open supply, supplier reality, quality/documents and decision boundaries.
Work itRecovery, alternatives/RFQ, commercial trade-offs, owners and escalation points.
Leave something usefulA clear action view: what changed, what remains, who owns it and by when.
Examples: a new component or revision cutover, a supplier capacity/recovery issue, or an alternative-source/RFQ problem.
04 / If Veo wants to try it in practice
A short period can be enough to see whether the fit works.
The goal is not to pretend I can learn Veo in three weeks. It is to make useful progress on something real and see how we work together.
Understand the problem
Learn the people, data, product/supplier context and decision boundaries. Agree what a useful result looks like.
Work the real issue
Validate the supplier/material reality, develop options and start the agreed actions.
Leave a usable result
Close what can be closed and leave clear next steps, owners, dates and remaining risks.
Optional week 4: only if it genuinely improves the result, handover or next-step decision.
Electrotechnical/electronics purchasing is already part of my background. The Veo-specific category depth is the part I would build while working on live problems.
05 / Ways to start
Use the route that fits the real need.
The route matters less than whether there is useful work and a sensible reason to start.
A · Direct role
If there is already a genuine role or need that fits, normal paid employment is the cleanest option.
B · Longer paid start
If there is sustained work but a supported start makes more sense, private løntilskud can provide a real paid period while I learn the Veo-specific context.
C · Short practical start
If Veo wants to start smaller, use one defined problem for a short virksomhedspraktik and see how the collaboration works.
Practical setup, if needed
- The exact route, duration and approval would be agreed with Veo and the municipality/jobcenter before any start.
- Private løntilskud is paid employment; virksomhedspraktik is a short placement. Both depend on the normal eligibility and approval rules.
Details can be handled only if the work itself makes sense first.
Next step
If there is a fit, start with the simplest route.
If there is a real need, I would rather work on it than wait for the perfect job title. If we work together now and something relevant comes up later, neither side is starting from zero.